Plaw+1 (628) 296-7377

Glossary

Confidence testing

It's what Seattle and most of Puget Sound call the routine fire system inspection and testing the rest of the country calls ITM.

A confidence test is Washington's name for the periodic inspection and testing of a fire protection system. It is the same work the rest of the country calls ITM.

The name covers the whole cycle: sprinkler systems, fire alarms, standpipes, fire pumps, kitchen hood systems, and in Seattle even emergency responder radio (BDA/DAS) systems. The procedures underneath are still NFPA 25 and NFPA 72. What changes is the wrapper: city-certified technicians, city report forms, city tag colors, and city filing deadlines.

Where it comes from

Not an NFPA term. NFPA 25 and NFPA 72 call this work inspection, testing, and maintenance. Confidence testing is Washington regulatory usage, written into city administrative rules and report forms rather than into a model code.

Seattle names it directly. Client Assistance Memo 5971, updated January 2025, describes fire protection systems testing, "also called confidence testing," performed by contractors holding Seattle Fire Department certification. The detail lives in SFD Administrative Rules 9.01 (technician certification), 9.02 (inspection, testing, maintenance, and reporting), and 9.04 (tags and impaired systems).

Bellevue runs the same vocabulary on its own paper: form FD-406, the Fire Sprinkler System Confidence Test Report, which certifies that the tests were conducted per NFPA 13 and NFPA 25. Statewide, the form points at WAC 212-80-175, which since 2005 has required anyone contracting to inspect and test water-based fire protection systems to hold at least NICET Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance Level 2 certification.

On the job

In Seattle, only SFD-certified technicians may test, maintain, or repair fire protection systems, and every report flows to the fire department through its third-party vendor, The Compliance Engine. The annual test report is due on the vendor's site within 7 calendar days of the test. A red-tagged system's report is due by the end of the day of the test.

Miss the deadline and the money lands on the contractor, not the owner: a $12 late fee per report, a possible $433 fire code citation, and the memo notes civil and criminal penalties that can reach $1,000 a day for uncorrected violations. The owner's side of the deal is retention: reports stay on the premises for at least three years.

After the test, the technician updates the tag. White means the system operates as designed, yellow means deficiencies were found, red means the system is impaired. A red tag triggers impairment duties: notify SFD immediately for an emergency impairment expected to last more than eight hours, five days ahead for a planned one, and stand a fire watch or other approved mitigation when an impairment runs past eight hours.

For a contractor coming in from outside Washington, the entry cost is credentials. WAC 212-80-175 requires NICET ITM Level 2 for water-based work statewide, and Seattle layers its own technician certification on top. You cannot just start testing.

Confidence testing versus ITM

Confidence testing and ITM are the same work under different management. ITM is the NFPA vocabulary: the inspection, testing, and maintenance program that NFPA 25 and NFPA 72 define. A confidence test is that program run inside a Washington city's reporting machine.

The difference that matters on a report: outside Washington you produce an NFPA 25 or NFPA 72 inspection and testing report and hand it to the owner. In Seattle the deliverable is a confidence test report filed with the fire department through its vendor, on deadline, with a white, yellow, or red result. Same test, different finish line.

So when a Seattle owner's contract says annual confidence tests and your proposal says annual ITM per NFPA 25, you are agreeing to the same scope. Just price in the city filing.

Read the itm entry.

Where it varies

Seattle
White tag for a system operating as designed, yellow for deficiencies, red for impaired. Reports go through The Compliance Engine within 7 calendar days, red-tag reports the day of the test, and only SFD-certified technicians may do the work.
Bellevue
Its own FD-406 Fire Sprinkler System Confidence Test Report, with the same white, yellow, red certification line and tests certified per NFPA 13 and NFPA 25.
Washington statewide
WAC 212-80-175 has required NICET ITM Level 2 certification for water-based system testing contractors since 2005.
Everywhere else
The term does not exist. The obligations map one for one onto the NFPA 25 and NFPA 72 ITM cycle, on whatever forms and tag colors the local AHJ uses.

Do not assume the tag scheme travels. Seattle's passing color is white. In another jurisdiction a white tag may mean nothing at all, and the passing color may be a different one entirely. Read the local rule before you buy tags.

Worked example

An operations manager for a three-building office park in Bellevue signs a new sprinkler contractor in January. The contract line reads annual confidence tests, all systems, and the contractor runs exactly the NFPA 25 annual work it would run in any other state. Two buildings pass and their FD-406 reports go in marked white. The third building's dry system fails its trip test, so that report goes in marked yellow with the deficiency written out, and the repair is scheduled before the follow-up visit.

Sources

  1. Seattle officially calls periodic fire protection systems testing confidence testing. Testing of Fire Protection Systems and Emergency Responder Radio Amplification Systems, SFD Client Assistance Memo 5971 (updated January 2025) (Seattle Fire Department Client Assistance Memo 5971 via seattle.gov).
    also called confidence testing
  2. Only SFD-certified technicians may test and maintain fire protection systems in Seattle. SFD Client Assistance Memo 5971 (Seattle Fire Department Client Assistance Memo 5971 via seattle.gov).
    Only SFD-certified technicians are allowed to install, maintain, test, and repair fire protection systems within the City of Seattle.
  3. Annual confidence test reports are due through The Compliance Engine within 7 calendar days. SFD Client Assistance Memo 5971 (Seattle Fire Department Client Assistance Memo 5971 via seattle.gov).
    the annual test report is submitted to the third-party vendor's website within 7 calendar days of the annual test
  4. Late reports carry a $12 per-report fee and a possible $433 fire code citation, charged to the testing company. SFD Client Assistance Memo 5971 (Seattle Fire Department Client Assistance Memo 5971 via seattle.gov).
    $12 per test report late fee, and may also be cited as a violation of the fire code with a citation penalty amount of $433
  5. Seattle tag colors: red impaired, yellow deficiencies, white operating as designed. SFD Client Assistance Memo 5971 (Seattle Fire Department Client Assistance Memo 5971 via seattle.gov).
    Red labels/tags indicate that the system is impaired.
  6. Reports must be kept on the premises for at least three years. SFD Client Assistance Memo 5971 (Seattle Fire Department Client Assistance Memo 5971 via seattle.gov).
    Reports must be maintained on the premises for a minimum of three years.
  7. Fire watch or other approved mitigation is required for impairments lasting more than eight hours. SFD Client Assistance Memo 5971 (Seattle Fire Department Client Assistance Memo 5971 via seattle.gov).
    An approved fire-watch or other approved mitigation is required for impairments lasting more than eight hours.
  8. Bellevue uses its own city confidence test report form for fire sprinkler systems. Bellevue Fire Department form FD-406, Fire Sprinkler System Confidence Test Report (City of Bellevue Fire Department report form FD-406 via bellevuewa.gov).
    FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONFIDENCE TEST REPORT
  9. WAC 212-80-175 requires water-based system testing contractors to hold at least NICET ITM Level 2. Bellevue Fire Department form FD-406 (Washington Administrative Code 212-80-175 as cited on Bellevue form FD-406).
    STATE CERTIFIED TO A MINIMUM OF NICET INSPECTION, TESTING, AND MAINTENANCE LEVEL 2
  10. Bellevue confidence tests are certified as conducted per NFPA 13 and NFPA 25. Bellevue Fire Department form FD-406 (City of Bellevue Fire Department report form FD-406 via bellevuewa.gov).
    HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13 AND NFPA 25

Related terms

  • ITM (inspection, testing, and maintenance). ITM is the whole program: inspecting the system, testing it to prove it works, and maintaining it so it keeps working, each on its own schedule.
  • Red tag. A red tag on the riser means the system is out of service and cannot be counted on in a fire.
  • Qualified personnel. Somebody the AHJ will actually accept as competent to inspect, test, or maintain the system, usually proven by a state license or a NICET card.
  • Five-year certification. The heavy five-year service California requires on sprinkler and standpipe systems: licensed company, full test battery, state label on the riser when it passes.
  • Functional test. A functional test makes the device actually operate and proves the signal landed. If nobody flowed water or tripped anything, it was just a look.

Verified August 7, 2026 against the sources above. Adopted editions and local amendments vary; your authority having jurisdiction has the final word. Nothing here is legal advice.